4.7 Article

SDF-1/CXCR4 axis enhances the immunomodulation of human endometrial regenerative cells in alleviating experimental colitis

期刊

STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1298-6

关键词

Endometrial regenerative cells; Stromal cell-derived factor-1; C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; Immunoregulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273257, 81471584]
  2. Tianjin Application Basis and Cutting-Edge Technology Research Grant [14JCZDJC35700]
  3. Li Jieshou Intestinal Barrier Research Special Fund [LJS_201412]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [18JCZDJC35800]
  5. Tianjin Medical University Talent Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endometrial regenerative cells (ERCs) are a new type of mesenchymal-like stromal cells, and their therapeutic potential has been tested in a variety of disease models. SDF-1/CXCR4 axis plays a chemotaxis role in stem/stromal cell migration. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of SDF-1/CXCR4 axis in the immunomodulation of ERCs on the experimental colitis. The immunomodulation of ERCs in the presence or absence of pretreatment of SDF-1 or AMD3100 was examined in both in vitro cell culture system and dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis in mice. The results showed that SDF-1 increased the expression of CXCR4 on the surface of ERCs. As compared with normal ERCs, the SDF-1-treated, CXCR4 high-expressing ERCs more significantly suppressed dendritic cell population as well as stimulated both type 2 macrophages and regulatory T cells in vitro and in vivo. Meanwhile, SDF-1-pretreated ERCs increased the generation of anti-inflammatory factors (e.g., IL-4, IL-10) and decreased the pro-inflammatory factors (e.g., IL-6, TNF-alpha). In addition, SDF-1-pretreated CM-Dil-labeled ERCs were found to engraft to injured colon. Our results may suggest that an SDF-1-induced high level of CXCR4 expression enhances the immunomodulation of ERCs in alleviating experimental colitis in mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据