4.7 Article

Vasculogenic properties of adventitial Sca-1+CD45+ progenitor cells in mice: a potential source of vasa vasorum in atherosclerosis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43765-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [GNT1086796]
  2. National Heart Foundation of Australia [FLF100412]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  4. James Nutter Family & Maria Long Family Fellowship in Cardiology at the Mayo Clinic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cellular origins of vasa vasorum are ill-defined and may involve circulating or local progenitor cells. We previously discovered that murine aortic adventitia contains Sca-1(+)CD45(+) progenitors that produce macrophages. Here we investigated whether they are also vasculogenic. In aortas of C57BL/6 mice, Sca-1(+)CD45(+) cells were localised to adventitia and lacked surface expression of endothelial markers (<1% for CD31, CD144, TIE-2). In contrast, they did show expression of CD31, CD144, TIE-2 and VEGFR2 in atherosclerotic ApoE(-/-) aortas. Although Sca-1(+)CD45(+) cells from C57BL/6 aorta did not express CD31, they formed CD31(+) colonies in endothelial differentiation media and produced interconnecting vascular-like cords in Matrigel that contained both endothelial cells and a small population of macrophages, which were located at branch points. Transfer of aortic Sca-1(+)CD45(+) cells generated endothelial cells and neovessels de novo in a hindlimb model of ischaemia and resulted in a 50% increase in perfusion compared to cell-free control. Similarly, their injection into the carotid adventitia of ApoE(-/-) mice produced donor-derived adventitial and peri-adventitial microvessels after atherogenic diet, suggestive of newly formed vasa vasorum. These findings show that beyond its content of macrophage progenitors, adventitial Sca-1(+)CD45(+) cells are also vasculogenic and may be a source of vasa vasorum during atherogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据