4.7 Article

Plasticity of patient-matched normal mammary epithelial cells is dependent on autologous adipose-derived stem cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47224-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. ELAN-Fonds, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg [13-12-11-1-Weigand]
  2. SofieWallner Stiftung
  3. Forschungsstiftung Medizin, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg
  4. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF, Faculty of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nurnberg [FAU])
  5. Xue Hong and Hans Georg Geis Foundation
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [326998133 - TRR 225]
  7. DFG [STR 923/6-1]
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  9. Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg (FAU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the increasing clinical application of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC), e. g. lipotransfer for breast reconstruction, this study aimed to gain novel insights regarding ADSC influence on breast tissue remodeling and determine patient-dependent factors affecting lipotransfer as well as begin to address its oncological risks. The ADSC secretome was analyzed from five normal breast reduction patients and contained elevated levels of growth factors, cytokines and proteins mediating invasion. ADSC/ADSC secretomes were tested for their influence on the function of primary mammary epithelial cells, and tumor epithelial cells using cell culture assays. ADSC/ADSC secretomes significantly stimulated proliferation, transmigration and 3D-invasion of primary normal and tumor epithelial cells. IL-6 significantly induced an EMT and invasion. The ADSC secretome significantly upregulated normal epithelial cell gene expression including MMPs and ECM receptors. Our study supports that ADSC and its secretome promote favorable conditions for normal breast tissue remodeling by changing the microenvironment. and may also be important regarding residual breast cancer cells following surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据