4.7 Article

A Rationally Designed Humanized Antibody Selective for Amyloid Beta Oligomers in Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46306-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Alberta Prion Research Institute
  3. Brain Canada
  4. Alberta Innovates Bio Solutions
  5. Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging
  6. Giancarlo and Odette Tognetti Trust Foundation
  7. ProMIS Neurosciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in the understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggest that pathogenesis is not directly related to plaque burden, but rather to soluble toxic amyloid-beta oligomers (A beta O). Therapeutic antibodies targeting A beta monomers and/or plaque have shown limited efficacy and dose-limiting adverse events in clinical trials. These findings suggest that antibodies capable of selectively neutralizing toxic A beta O may achieve improved efficacy and safety. To this end, we generated monoclonal antibodies against a conformational A beta epitope predicted by computational modeling to be presented on toxic A beta O but not monomers or fibrils. The resulting lead antibody, PMN310, showed the desired A beta O-selective binding profile. In vitro, PMN310 inhibited A beta O propagation and toxicity. In vivo, PMN310 prevented A beta O-induced loss of memory formation and reduced synaptic loss and inflammation. A humanized version (huPMN310) compared favorably to other A beta-directed antibodies showing a lack of adverse event-associated binding to A beta deposits in AD brains, and greater selective binding to A beta O-enriched AD brain fractions that contain synaptotoxic A beta species. Systemic administration of huPMN310 in mice resulted in brain exposure and kinetics comparable to those of other therapeutic human monoclonal antibodies. Greater selectivity for A beta O and the potential to safely administer high doses of huPMN310 are expected to result in enhanced safety and therapeutic potency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据