4.7 Article

Towards a reliable assessment of Asian elephant population parameters: the application of photographic spatial capture-recapture sampling in a priority floodplain ecosystem

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44795-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Fish and Wildlife Service-Asian Elephant Conservation Fund [F16AP00326, F17AP00323]
  2. Department of Science and Technology-Innovation in Science Pursuit for Inspired Research
  3. Liz Claiborne and Art Ortenberg Foundation
  4. Wildlife Conservation Society, New York

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hitherto difficult task of reliably estimating populations of wide-ranging megafauna has been enabled by advances in capture-recapture methodology. Here we combine photographic sampling with a Bayesian spatially-explicit capture-recapture (SCR) model to estimate population parameters for the endangered Asian elephant Elephas maximus in the productive floodplain ecosystem of Kaziranga National Park, India. Posterior density estimates of herd-living adult females and sub-adult males and females (herd-adults) was 0.68 elephants/km(2) (95% Credible Intervals, Crl = 0.56-0.81) while that of adult males was 0.24 elephants/km(2) (95% Crl = 0.18-0.30), with posterior density estimates highlighting spatial heterogeneity in elephant distribution. Estimates of the space-usage parameter suggested that herd-adults ((sigma) over cap (HA)= 5.91 km, 95% Crl = 5.18-6.81) moved around considerably more than adult males ((sigma) over cap (AM) = 3.64 km, 95% Crl = 3.09-4.34). Based on elephant movement and age-sex composition, we derived the population that contributed individuals sampled in Kaziranga to be 908 herd-adults, 228 adult males and 610 young (density= 0.46 young/km(2), SD =0.06). Our study demonstrates how SCR is suited to estimating geographically open populations, characterising spatial heterogeneity in fine-scale density, and facilitating reliable monitoring to assess population status and dynamics for science and conservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据