4.7 Article

Propidium iodide staining underestimates viability of adherent bacterial cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42906-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Estonian Research Council [IUT 23-5, PUT 748]
  2. European Regional Development Fund [TK134]
  3. ERDF project Centre of Technologies and Investigations of Nanomaterials (NAMUR+) [2014-2020.4.01.16-0123]
  4. EU COST Action [CA15114]
  5. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through COMPETE2020 -Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (POCI) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939, UID/EQU/00511/2019]
  6. national funds (PIDDAC) through FCT -Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia/MCTES
  7. project LEPABE-2-ECO-INNOVATION - Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combining membrane impermeable DNA-binding stain propidium iodide (PI) with membrane-permeable DNA-binding counterstains is a widely used approach for bacterial viability staining. In this paper we show that PI staining of adherent cells in biofilms may significantly underestimate bacterial viability due to the presence of extracellular nucleic acids (eNA). We demonstrate that gram-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis and gram-negative Escherichia coli 24-hour initial biofilms on glass consist of 76 and 96% PI-positive red cells in situ, respectively, even though 68% the cells of either species in these aggregates are metabolically active. Furthermore, 82% of E. coli and 89% S. epidermidis are cultivable after harvesting. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) revealed that this false dead layer of red cells is due to a subpopulation of double-stained cells that have green interiors under red coating layer which hints at eNA being stained outside intact membranes. Therefore, viability staining results of adherent cells should always be validated by an alternative method for estimating viability, preferably by cultivation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据