4.7 Article

Transcriptome and digital gene expression analysis unravels the novel mechanism of early flowering in Angelica sinensis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46414-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30801518, 81773848]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-21]
  3. Open Project Program of the Jiangsu Key Laboratory for High Technology Research of TCM Formulae [FJGJS-2015-12]
  4. Jiangsu key point research and invention program [BE2017728]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels is a widely used medicinal plant mainly originated in Gansu, China. Angelica sinensis is greatly demanded in the clinical practice of Chinese medicine due to its broad pharmacological activities of hematopoietic and anti-inflammatory properties. But, the percentage of early flowering in Angelica sinensis arrives to 20%similar to 30%, which severely affects its quality and quantity. Here, transcriptome profiling and digital gene expression analysis were applied to study the mechanism of early flowering in Angelica sinensis. A total of 49,183,534 clean reads were obtained and assembled into 68,262 unigenes, and 49,477 unigenes (72.5%) could be annotated to a minimum of one database in the Nr, Nt, Swiss-Pro, GO, COG and KEGG. Taking the above transcriptome data as a reference, digital gene expression result showed that 5,094 genes expression level were significant changed during early flowering. These annotated genes offered much information promoting that the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites pathway, the hormone signal transduction pathway, and the transcription regulation system may be closely related to the early flowering phenomenon of Angelica sinensis. Further expression patterns of key genes contribute to early flowering were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR. The transcriptome result offered important gene expression information about early flowering in Angelica sinensis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据