4.7 Article

Food and Nutrient Intake during Pregnancy in Relation to Maternal Characteristics: Results from the NICE Birth Cohort in Northern Sweden

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11071680

关键词

nutrition; pregnancy; micronutrients; macronutrients; food intake; lifestyle; NICE study

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [521-2013-3154]
  2. Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life andWelfare (FORTE) [2014-0923]
  3. Vastra Gotaland Region [612-0618-15]
  4. Jane and Dan Olsson Foundation
  5. Research and Innovation Unit at Region Norrbotten
  6. Magnus Bergvalls Foundation [2017-02297]
  7. Willhelm and Martina Lundgren Foundation [2018-2250]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Linkages between diet and other lifestyle factors may confound observational studies. We used cluster analysis to analyze how the intake of food and nutrients during pregnancy co-varies with lifestyle, clinical and demographic factors in 567 women who participated in the NICE (nutritional impact on immunological maturation during childhood in relation to the environment) birth-cohort in northern Sweden. A food frequency questionnaire, Meal-Q, was administered in pregnancy Week 34, and the reported food and nutrient intakes were related to maternal characteristics such as age, education, rural/town residence, parity, pre-pregnancy smoking, first-trimester BMI, allergy and hyperemesis. Two lifestyle-diet clusters were identified: (1) High level of education and higher age were related to one another, and associated with a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains and fish, and (2) smoking before pregnancy and higher BMI in early pregnancy were related to one another and associated with a diet that contained white bread, French fries, pizza, meat, soft drinks, candy and snacks. More than half of the women had lower-than-recommended daily intake levels of vitamin D, folate, selenium, and iodine. Complex lifestyle-diet interactions should be considered in observational studies that link diet and pregnancy outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据