4.5 Article

Testing differential networks with applications to the detection of gene-gene interactions

期刊

BIOMETRIKA
卷 102, 期 2, 页码 247-266

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asu074

关键词

Differential network; False discovery rate; Gaussian graphical model; Gene-gene interaction; High-dimensional precision matrix; Large-scale multiple testing

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1208982] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Model organisms and human studies have yielded increasing empirical evidence that interactions among genes contribute broadly to genetic variation of complex traits. In the presence of gene-gene interactions, the dimensionality of the feature space becomes extremely high relative to the sample size. This poses a significant methodological challenge in the identification of gene-gene interactions. In this paper, by using a Gaussian graphical model framework, we translate the problem of identifying gene-gene interactions associated with a binary trait D into an inference problem on the difference of two high-dimensional precision matrices that summarize the conditional dependence network structures of the genes. We propose a procedure for testing the differential network globally, which is particularly powerful against sparse alternatives. In addition, a multiple testing procedure with false discovery rate control is developed to infer the specific structure of the differential network. Theoretical justification is provided to ensure the validity of the proposed tests, and optimality results are derived under sparsity assumptions. Through a simulation study we demonstrate that the proposed tests maintain the desired error rates under the null hypothesis and have good power under the alternative hypothesis. The methods are applied to a breast cancer gene expression study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据