4.2 Review

Targeting broadly neutralizing antibody precursors: a naive approach to vaccine design

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 294-301

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000548

关键词

broadly neutralizing antibodies; germinal centers; germline-targeting; HIV-1; vaccines

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [1P01 AI138212-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review It is believed that broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) will be an important component of an effective HIV-1 vaccine. Several immunogens have been designed that can target specific precursor B cells as a first step in a vaccine strategy to elicit bNAbs. Recent findings Germline-targeting immunogens have been developed that specifically engage precursors of reproducible classes of anti-HIV antibodies, such as VRC01-class and apex-directed bNAbs. However, these precursors represent only a small portion of the immune repertoire and any antigen will inherently present off-target epitopes to the immune system that may confound bNAb development. Novel animal models are being utilized to understand the competitive fitness of bNAb precursors in the context of immunization with germline-targeting immunogens. In parallel, immunogen design efforts are being pursued to favor the development of bNAb responses over off-target responses following immunization. New studies of bNAb precursor interactions with glycosylated Env variants can inform prime-boost regimens geared towards accelerating bNAb development. Summary Germline-targeting immunogens hold promise as a first step in eliciting a bNAb response through vaccination. A better understating of how efficiently germline-targeting immunogens can specifically target rare bNAb precursors is emerging. In addition, a more comprehensive structure-based understanding of critical barriers to bNAb elicitation, as well as commonalities between bNAb classes can further inform vaccine design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据