4.6 Article

High-speed OCT-based ocular biometer combined with an air-puff system for determination of induced retraction-free eye dynamics

期刊

BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 3663-3680

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.003663

关键词

-

资金

  1. Polish National Science Center [2015/18/E/NZ5/00697, 2014/14/E/ST7/00637]
  2. European Fund within the Smart Growth Operational Programme 2014-2020 (TEAM) [POIR.04.04.00-00-5C9B/17-00]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research, technological development and demonstration program (BE-OPTICAL) [675512]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020, Information and Communication Technologies (IMCUSTOMEYE) [779960]
  5. European Social Fund under the Knowledge Education Development Operational Programme [POWR.03.03.00-00-PN/13/18]
  6. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (CREATE) [666295]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate a swept source OCT-based ocular biometer integrated with an air-puff stimulus to study the reaction of the eye to mechanical stimulation in vivo. The system enables simultaneous measurement of the stimulus strength and high-speed imaging of the eye dynamics along the visual axis. We characterize the stimulus and perform optimization of the data acquisition for a proper interpretation of the results. Access to the dynamics of axial eye length allows for a determination of the eye retraction, which is used to correct the air-puff induced displacement of ocular structures. We define the parameters to quantify the reaction of the eye to the air puff and determine their reproducibility in a group of healthy subjects. We observe the corneal deformation process and axial wobbling of the crystalline lens. OCT biometer combined with the air puff is the first instrument with the potential to provide comprehensive information on the biomechanics of ocular components. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据