4.8 Article

Constant Electrode Potential Quantum Mechanical Study of CO2 Electrochemical Reduction Catalyzed by N-Doped Graphene

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 8197-8207

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01318

关键词

N-doped graphene; CO2 reduction; electrocatalysis; constant potential model; density functional theory; quantum mechanics

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0208200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872079, 21606142]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China [MOST 107-2113-M-006-008-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, quantum mechanics combined with a constant electrode potential model were employed to study CO2 electrochemical reduction (CO2ER) on N-doped graphenes under U = -1.0 V-SHE. Our goal was to investigate whether metal-free N-doped graphene itself can reduce CO2 and identify the reaction centers. We considered both the thermodynamics and kinetics of the process. Among the 26 reaction sites that were screened, only 2 of these sites could reduce CO2 to CO(g) with a kinetic barrier (Delta G double dagger(sic)) of similar to 0.55 eV for the rate-determining step and downhill thermodynamics for each elementary step. Both sites are composed of carbon atoms on the edge of graphene and adjacent to graphitic nitrogen atoms. Two other motifs (composed of either pyridinic or pyrrolic N) were also able to reduce CO2 to surface-bound CO with Delta G(sic) values less than 0.70 eV. However, despite favorable thermodynamics, the reduction of the bound CO to CHO suffered from larger Delta G(sic) values (>0.97 eV), rendering the reaction inaccessible. Therefore, N-doped graphene is able to reduce CO2 to CO(g) or surface-bound CO. However, further reactions beyond two-proton-two-electron reduction are unlikely. In addition, the evaluation of the performance of a site for the CO2 ER must consider both the thermodynamics and kinetics of the process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据