4.8 Article

Translatome analysis reveals altered serine and glycine metabolism in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10508-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. ERC [334946]
  2. FWO [G067015N, G084013N, 1509814N, 1S07118N, 1S49817N]
  3. Stichting Tegen Kanker [2016-775, 2016-801, 2012-176]
  4. KU Leuven Research Council [C14/18/104]
  5. Lady Tata Memorial Trust International Award for research in Leukemia
  6. leukemia research grant from the Me To You Foundation
  7. fellowship Emmanuel van der Schueren from Kom op tegen Kanker
  8. Jose Carreras EHA junior research grant
  9. Emmanuel van der Schueren from Kom op tegen Kanker
  10. KU Leuven Methusalem Co-funding
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [334946] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Somatic ribosomal protein mutations have recently been described in cancer, yet their impact on cellular transcription and translation remains poorly understood. Here, we integrate mRNA sequencing, ribosome footprinting, polysomal RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry datasets from a mouse lymphoid cell model to characterize the T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) associated ribosomal RPL10 R98S mutation. Surprisingly, RPL10 R98S induces changes in protein levels primarily through transcriptional rather than translation efficiency changes. Phosphoserine phosphatase (PSPH), encoding a key serine biosynthesis enzyme, was the only gene with elevated transcription and translation leading to protein overexpression. PSPH upregulation is a general phenomenon in T-ALL patient samples, associated with elevated serine and glycine levels in xenograft mice. Reduction of PSPH expression suppresses proliferation of T-ALL cell lines and their capacity to expand in mice. We identify ribosomal mutation driven induction of serine biosynthesis and provide evidence supporting dependence of T-ALL cells on PSPH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据