4.8 Article

TUBG1 missense variants underlying cortical malformations disrupt neuronal locomotion and microtubule dynamics but not neurogenesis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10081-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU Seventh Framework Programme FP7 under the project GENCODYS [2009-2.1.1-1/241995]
  2. EU Seventh Framework Programme FP7 under the project DESIRE [602531]
  3. French state funds through the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-15-CE16-0018-01]
  4. programme Investissements d'Avenir labelled [ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02, ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT, ANR-10-INBS-07 PHENOMIN]
  5. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [16-23702s, 18-27197s]
  6. [RVO 68378050]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-15-CE16-0018] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

De novo heterozygous missense variants in the gamma-tubulin gene TUBG1 have been linked to human malformations of cortical development associated with intellectual disability and epilepsy. Here, we investigated through in-utero electroporation and in-vivo studies, how four of these variants affect cortical development. We show that TUBG1 mutants affect neuronal positioning, disrupting the locomotion of new-born neurons but without affecting progenitors' proliferation. We further demonstrate that pathogenic TUBG1 variants are linked to reduced microtubule dynamics but without major structural nor functional centrosome defects in subject-derived fibroblasts. Additionally, we developed a knock-in Tubg1(Y)(92)(C/+) mouse model and assessed consequences of the mutation. Although centrosomal positioning in bipolar neurons is correct, they fail to initiate locomotion. Furthermore, Tubg1(Y)(92)(C/+) animals show neuroanatomical and behavioral defects and increased epileptic cortical activity. We show that Tubg1(Y)(92)(C/+) mice partially mimic the human phenotype and therefore represent a relevant model for further investigations of the physiopathology of cortical malformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据