4.8 Article

The viral protein corona directs viral pathogenesis and amyloid aggregation

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10192-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Svenska Sallskapet for Medicinsk Forskning (SSMF)
  2. Swedish Research Council [K2015-99 x -22880-01-6, 2016-01653]
  3. Stockholm University
  4. Vetenskapsradet
  5. SSMF
  6. Swedish foundation for Strategic Research
  7. Instumentarium Science Foundation
  8. service of the Electron Tomography Facility at Karolinska Institutet
  9. Academy of Finland
  10. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation [20150303]
  11. Karolinska Institutet
  12. Stockholm County Council [20140309]
  13. Karolinska Institutet [20140309]
  14. Swedish Research Council [2016-01653] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  15. MRC [MR/N024850/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial nanoparticles accumulate a protein corona layer in biological fluids, which significantly influences their bioactivity. As nanosized obligate intracellular parasites, viruses share many biophysical properties with artificial nanoparticles in extracellular environments and here we show that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) accumulate a rich and distinctive protein corona in different biological fluids. Moreover, we show that corona pre-coating differentially affects viral infectivity and immune cell activation. In addition, we demonstrate that viruses bind amyloidogenic peptides in their corona and catalyze amyloid formation via surface-assisted heterogeneous nucleation. Importantly, we show that HSV-1 catalyzes the aggregation of the amyloid beta-peptide (A beta(42)), a major constituent of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease, in vitro and in animal models. Our results highlight the viral protein corona as an acquired structural layer that is critical for viral-host interactions and illustrate a mechanistic convergence between viral and amyloid pathologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据