4.8 Article

Structural defects on converted bismuth oxide nanotubes enable highly active electrocatalysis of carbon dioxide reduction

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10819-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018YFA0305800, 2017YFA0204800]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51622211, 21873050]
  5. Oregon State University
  6. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX17_2045]
  7. E. I. duPont de Nemours Co.
  8. Northwestern University
  9. Dow Chemical Company
  10. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formic acid (or formate) is suggested to be one of the most economically viable products from electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. However, its commercial viability hinges on the development of highly active and selective electrocatalysts. Here we report that structural defects have a profound positive impact on the electrocatalytic performance of bismuth. Bismuth oxide double-walled nanotubes with fragmented surface are prepared as a template, and are cathodically converted to defective bismuth nanotubes. This converted electrocatalyst enables carbon dioxide reduction to formate with excellent activity, selectivity and stability. Most significantly, its current density reaches similar to 288 mA cm(-2) at -0.61 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode within a flow cell reactor under ambient conditions. Using density functional theory calculations, the excellent activity and selectivity are rationalized as the outcome of abundant defective bismuth sites that stabilize the *OCHO intermediate. Furthermore, this electrocatalyst is coupled with silicon photocathodes and achieves high-performance photoelectrochemical carbon dioxide reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据