4.7 Article

Microglia-derived TNF-α mediates endothelial necroptosis aggravating blood brain-barrier disruption after ischemic stroke

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-019-1716-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2018YFC1312200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571119, 81400969, 81400970, 81771249, 81671147, 81601027]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1300600]
  4. National Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120142110068]
  5. New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endothelium (EC) is a key component of bloodbrain barrier (BBB), and has an important position in the neurovascular unit. Its dysfunction and death after cerebral ischemic/reperfusion (I/R) injury not only promote evolution of neuroinflammation and brain edema, but also increase the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage of thrombolytic therapies. However, the mechanism and specific interventions of EC death after I/R injury are poorly understood. Here we showed that necroptosis was a mechanism underlying EC death, which promoted BBB breakdown after I/R injury. Treatment of rats with receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1)inhibitor, necrostatin1 reduced endothelial necroptosis and BBB leakage. We furthermore showed that perivascular M1-like microgliainduced endothelial necroptosis leading to BBB disruption requires tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) secreted by M1 type microglia and its receptor, TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1), on endothelium as the primary mediators of these effects. More importantly, anti-TNFa (infliximab, a potent clinically used drug) treatment significantly ameliorate endothelial necroptosis, BBB destruction and improve stroke outcomes. Our data identify a previously unexplored role for endothelial necroptosis in BBB disruption and suggest infliximab might serve as a potential drug for stroke therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据