4.7 Article

Candida albicans Augments Staphylococcus aureus Virulence by Engaging the Staphylococcal agr Quorum Sensing System

期刊

MBIO
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00910-19

关键词

Candida albicans; intraabdominal infection; polymicrobial

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01AI116025, R01AI134796]
  2. Center for Pediatric and Experimental Therapeutics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus are among the most prevalent nosocomial pathogens that are responsible for severe morbidity and mortality, even with appropriate treatment. Using a murine model of polymicrobial intra-abdominal infection (IAI), we have previously shown that coinfection with these pathogens results in synergistic lethality that is partially dependent on exacerbated prostaglandin signaling, while monomicrobial infection is nonlethal. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify staphylococcal virulence determinants that drive lethal synergism during polymicrobial IAI. Using the toxigenic S. aureus strain JE2, we observed that coinfection with C. albicans led to a striking 80 to 100% mortality rate within 20 h postinoculation (p.i.) while monomicrobial infections were nonlethal. Use of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-P3 promoter S. aureus reporter strain revealed enhanced activation of the staphylococcal agr quorum sensing system during in vitro polymicrobial versus monomicrobial growth. Analyses by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), Western blot, and toxin functional assays confirmed enhanced agr-associated gene transcription and increases in secreted alpha-and delta-toxins. C. albicans-mediated elevated toxin production and hemolytic activity were determined to be agrA dependent, and genetic knockout and complementation of hla identified alpha-toxin as the key staphylococcal virulence factor driving lethal synergism. Analysis of mono-and polymicrobial infections 8 h p.i. demonstrated equivalent bacterial burdens in the peritoneal cavity but significantly elevated levels of alpha-toxin (3-fold) and the eicosanoid prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (4-fold) during coinfection. Importantly, prophylactic passive immunization using the monoclonal anti-alpha-toxin antibody MEDI4893* led to significantly improved survival rates compared to those following treatment with isotype control antibody. Collectively, these results define alpha-toxin as an essential virulence determinant during C. albicans-S. aureus IAI and describe a novel mechanism by which a human-pathogenic fungus can augment the virulence of a highly pathogenic bacterium in vivo. IMPORTANCE Relatively little is known about the complex interactions and signaling events that occur between microbes and even less so about how microbial cross talk shapes human health and disease. Candida albicans (a fungus) and Staphylococcus aureus (a bacterium) are formidable human nosocomial pathogens, causing severe morbidity and mortality. Moreover, they are frequently coisolated from central venous catheters and deep-seated infections, including intra-abdominal sepsis. In this work, we have shown that coinfection with C. albicans and S. aureus is highly lethal, leading to >80% mortality by day 1 postinfection, whereas monoinfection with C. albicans or S. aureus does not cause mortality. This infectious synergism is dependent on the expression of staphylococcal alpha-toxin, and secretion of this potent virulence factor is actually augmented by C. albicans via an agr-dependent mechanism. Moreover, prophylactic neutralization of alpha-toxin with a monoclonal antibody is sufficient to elicit protection during coinfection. Therefore, we have demonstrated that a pathogenic fungus can enhance virulence determinants of a bacterium in vivo with devastating consequences to the host. These results have important implications in the surveillance and treatment of polymicrobial disease and highlight the dynamic intersection of environment, pathogens, and host.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据