4.5 Editorial Material

Strengthening China's national biodiversity strategy to attain an ecological civilization

期刊

CONSERVATION LETTERS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12660

关键词

biodiversity conservation; ecological civilization; ecological sustainability; ecosystem services; environmental investment; governance; habitat restoration; mainstreaming biodiversity; protected areas; systematic conservation planning

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0502103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670539, 41701110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biodiversity conservation is essential for realizing China's new vision of an ecological civilization. China has been implementing numerous massive ecological sustainability and protected area (ES&PA) programs across the entire country. These programs have greatly restored degraded ecological environments, improved provisions of critical ecosystem services and increased rural livelihoods. However, despite the general improvements in environmental quality, the trend of rapid biodiversity loss has not been significantly reduced. We found that most of the current ES&PA programs lack explicit biodiversity goals, and thus have limited contributions to the conservation of biodiversity. Given the limited resources available for and huge investments associated with these programs, achieving greater biodiversity gains under them is the most cost-effective way to conserve biodiversity. We recommend six strategies for strengthening the country's biodiversity conservation, that is, strengthening biodiversity in ES&PA programs, PAs as the core, integrating biodiversity and ecosystem services, delivering effective monitoring, broad inclusiveness of stakeholders and mainstreaming biodiversity. These strategies also highlight China's priorities for achieving significant progresses toward the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, and should be important options for developing China's post-2020 biodiversity framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据