4.4 Article

Time-varying serum albumin levels and all-cause mortality in prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients: a 5-year observational study

期刊

BMC NEPHROLOGY
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1433-8

关键词

Albumin; Mortality; Peritoneal dialysis

资金

  1. Tianjin Science and Technology Program [15ZXLCSY00020]
  2. Research Project of Tianjin Municipal Health Commission on key areas of TCM [2018004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In this study, we investigated the association of time-varying serum albumin levels with mortality over a 5-year period in one cohort of patients undergoing long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy. Methods: The participants in this study enrolled 302 patients who underwent long-term PD at a single PD center in Taiwan. We reviewed medical records from 2011 to 2015 retrospectively. Time-averaged albumin level and serum albumin reach rate (defined as the percentage of serum albumin measurements that reached >= 3.5 gdL) were applied as the predictor variables in the first 2 years (2011-2012). All-cause mortality was used as the outcome variable in the subsequent 3 years (2013-2015). Hazard function of all-cause mortality in the study participants was examined by using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: Patients with different albumin reach rates (75 < 100%, 50 < 75%, 1 < 50%) did not exhibit a significantly increased risk for all-cause mortality. Patients with a 0% albumin reach rate exhibited a significantly increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 7.59, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38-24.21) by fully adjusted analysis. Patients with time-averaged albumin levels of < 3.5 gdL (HR 15.49, 95% CI 1.74-137.72) exhibited a higher risk for all-cause mortality than those with serum albumin levels >= 4.0 gdL. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that higher serum albumin reach rates and higher time-averaged serum albumin levels are associated with a lower mortality rate over a 5-year period among patients undergoing long-term PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据