4.5 Article

Natural Cellulosic Fiber from Coccinia Indica Stem for Polymer Composites: Extraction and Characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 644-652

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2019.1642826

关键词

Coccinia Indica fiber; technical properties; morphology; reinforcement; conventional fibers; medicinal plant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study confirmed the high cellulose content and lower amounts of lignin, hemicellulose, ash, and wax content in Coccinia Indica fibers. The fibers exhibit a multi-cellular structure and good mechanical properties, suitable for use as reinforcement in composite materials.
This study mainly focuses on the possibility of using Coccinia Indica (CI) fiber as reinforcement in structural polymer composite materials because of its lightweight and eco-friendly nature. Fibers were extracted from the dried stems by combing process using metal teeth brush. The thermo-physico-mechanical properties, chemical compositions, and morphological structures of CI fiber were analyzed in detail. A higher percentage of cellulose content in CI fiber and the lesser amount of skimpy lignin, hemicellulose, ash, and wax content were confirmed through chemical analysis. The functional groups with their corresponding peaks were depicted through FTIR analysis. XRD studies divulge that the CI fiber contains crystallinity index (CrI) of 53.03% and crystallite size (L) of 5.81 nm. SEM revealed that the fiber possesses cylindrical morphology with multi-cellular structure. The presence of parenchyma and chlorenchyma tissues in the cell wall of CI fiber was also confirmed, which helps for better adhesion and mechanical properties to the composite. TGA study reveals that the major degradation of CI fiber occurs at a temperature range of 204.16 degrees C to 376.3 degrees C. The tensile strength of cellulose-based CI fiber is comparable with the other conventional fibers and it is well enough for its usage as reinforcing material in composite manufacturing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据