4.5 Article

High sustained virologic response rates of sofosbuvir-based regimens in Chinese patients with HCV genotype 3a infection in a real-world setting

期刊

VIROLOGY JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12985-019-1184-y

关键词

Hepatitis C; Genotype 3; Cirrhosis; Renal impairment; Treatment

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPatients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 infection remain a difficult-to-cure population. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based regimen in genotype 3 patients in a real-world setting.MethodsHCV genotype 3a-infected adults with compensated liver disease were treated with sofosbuvir (SOF)/velpatasvir (VEL) or SOF/daclatasvir (DCV) with or without ribavirin (RBV) for 12 or 24weeks, respectively. Efficacy was measured by sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12). Adverse events were evaluated throughout the treatment and follow-up course.ResultsA total of 41 genotype 3a-infected patients were included. Of them, 10 patients (24%) had cirrhosis, 3 (7%) had renal impairment, and 2 (5%) failed previous treatment. Nine patients (22%) were treated with SOF/VEL and 32 (78%) with SOF/DCV with or without RBV. SVR 12 was achieved in 100% (9/9) of patients treated with SOF/VEL for 12weeks and in 97% (31/32) of those treated with SOF/DCV for 12 or 24weeks. RBV addition and extension of treatment duration did not improve the SVR of SOF/DCV (RR: 1.04; P=0.99 and RR: 1.09; P=0.375, respectively). Ten patients with cirrhosis, 1 on hemodialysis and 2 with treatment-experience achieved SVR12. One treatment-naive non-cirrhotic patient on hemodialysis treated with SOF/DCV for 24weeks relapsed at week 8 post-treatment. No serious adverse events and relevant laboratory abnormalities were observed.ConclusionSOF/VEL and SOF/DCV are highly efficacious and well tolerated in genotype 3a-infected patients with or without cirrhosis. RBV coadministration and extension of SOF/DCV treatment appear to add no improvement for efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据