4.7 Article

Longitudinal study reveals persistent environmental Salmonella Heidelberg in Brazilian broiler farms

期刊

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 118-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.04.004

关键词

Salmonella Heidelberg; Broiler; Litter; Feed; Evaporative cooling system

资金

  1. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation -Embrapa [0313100900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vast capacity for maintenance and dissemination in the environment are major challenges for the control a Salmonella spp. in poultry farms. The aim of this study was to assess environmental contamination by non typhoidal Salmonella in successive broiler flocks in nine commercial broiler farms integrated with three corn panies in the south of Brazil, for a twelve-month production period. Recycled broiler litter, feed and swabs from the evaporative cooling system pads were analyzed, and the total enterobacteria count in the litter samples was ascertained. Positive broiler houses were identified in two of the three broiler companies studied, in which non typhoidal Salmonella were detected for the first time in the first or second flock, and recurred in the recycle litter of subsequent flocks. Feed and evaporative cooling pad swab samples were also positive in at least one a the assessed flocks. The majority of the isolates (87.5%) originating from different flocks, broiler houses am companies that were sampled were identified as S. Heidelberg, with the prevalence of one single genotype. The total enterobacteria levels in the litter diminished as the flocks progressed, but the presence of Salmonella spp was constant over the course of time, indicating that the litter management procedures were not capable a interrupting the cycle of residual contamination. The predominance of S. Heidelberg highlights its emergent and dissemination in this region, as well as its resistance and maintenance in the environment, and reinforces the need to improve prevention and recycled litter management measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据