4.6 Article

Binding of human myeloperoxidase to red blood cells: Molecular targets and biophysical consequences at the plasma membrane level

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 591, 期 -, 页码 87-97

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.12.007

关键词

Myeloperoxidase; Erythrocytes; Cell deformability; Cardiovascular diseases; Lectin; Oxidative/halogenative stress

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research [15-34-50014, 14-04-90007, 16-54-00038]
  2. Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research [B14R-035]
  3. RW Internal Research Programs [R5082A02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an oxidant-producing enzyme that can also bind to cellular surface proteins. We found that band 3 protein and glycophorins A and B were the key MPO-binding targets of human red blood cells (RBCs). The interaction of MPO with RBC proteins was mostly electrostatic in nature because it was inhibited by desialation, exogenic sialic acid, high ionic strength, and extreme pH. In addition, MPO failed to interfere with the lectin-induced agglutination of RBCs, suggesting a minor role of glycanrecognizing mechanisms in MPO binding. Multiple biophysical properties of RBCs were altered in the presence of native (i.e., not hypochlorous acid-damaged) MPO. These changes included transmembrane potential, availability of intracellular Ca2+, and lipid organization in the plasma membrane. MPO-treated erythrocytes became larger in size, structurally more rigid, and hypersensitive to acidic and osmotic hemolysis. Furthermore, we found a significant correlation between the plasma MPO concentration and RBC rigidity index in type-2 diabetes patients with coronary heart disease. These findings suggest that MPO functions as a mediator of novel regulatory mechanism in microcirculation, indicating the influence of MPO-induced abnormalities on RBC deformability under pathological stress conditions. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据