4.5 Article

Chitosan alters inactivated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine elicited immune responses without affecting lung histopathology in mice

期刊

VACCINE
卷 37, 期 30, 页码 4031-4039

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.003

关键词

Respiratory syncytial virus; Vaccine; Immunopathology; Vaccine safety

资金

  1. Genomics Research and Development Initiative Grant, Government of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan is a polysaccharide capable of augmenting immune responses with a proven safety record in animals and humans. These properties make it a potentially attractive agent for the prevention and treatment of infectious disease. Infection by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of serious lower respiratory disease in young children throughout the world. There is no licensed vaccine available against RSV whereas inactivated vaccine is known to cause enhanced respiratory disease instead of protection. Here, we investigated whether chitosan administered one or three days post-infection could protect animals against RSV infection and whether it could alter immune responses or immunopathology induced by inactivated RSV vaccine when administered twice before RSV infection. We found chitosan could modestly protect animals against RSV infection when given post-infection, while, in conjunction with inactivated RSV vaccine when given pre-infection, it could significantly reduce RSV infection in mice. Further mechanistic investigation revealed that chitosan enhanced antigen-specific immune responses through augmenting the induction of regulatory T cells, lung resident T cells and neutralizing antibodies while reversing Th2-skewed immune responses induced by inactivated RSV vaccine but, surprisingly, failing to reverse lung histopathology. Overall, this study sheds more light on the molecular mechanisms underlying inactivated RSV vaccine-induced disease. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据