4.7 Article

One-pot synthesis of a magnetic nanocomposite based on ultrasound-assisted co-precipitation for enrichment of Hg(II) prior to detection by a direct mercury analyzer

期刊

TALANTA
卷 199, 期 -, 页码 449-456

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.085

关键词

Mercury enrichment; Magnetic phase; One-pot synthesis; Ultrasound-assisted co-precipitation; Direct mercury analyzer

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2015-68146-P]
  2. Xunta de Galicia [POS-B/2017/2012-PR]
  3. European Social Funding [P.P. 0000421S 140.08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasound-assisted co-precipitation was applied to construct a magnetic nanocomposite following a 'one-pot' synthetic strategy for Hg(II) enrichment. The presence of a noble metal such as Ag(I), Au(III), Pd(II) in the synthesis medium proved to be essential in order to attain an efficient co-precipitation of Hg with the magnetic nanoparticles. Following this preconcentration procedure, thermal desorption and a further preconcentration was carried out by amalgamation onto a gold coil placed inside a direct mercury analyzer working under the principle of atomic absorption. The magnetic nanocomposite was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy coupled to energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (HR-TEM-EDS) and total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF). Magnetic nanoparticles with a size in the range of ca. 7-11 nm were obtained. After full optimization of variables influencing the preconcentration and detection of Hg, analytical characteristics were obtained. A detection limit as low as 3.2 ng/L Hg was obtained when 50 mu L of the magnetic phase were introduced in the mercury analyzer. The repeatability and reproducibility expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD) were 7% and 10%, respectively. Several certified reference materials, synthetic and unknown water samples were analyzed showing Hg recoveries in the range of 88-115%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据