4.5 Article

Development of a bridge maintenance system for prestressed concrete bridges using 3D digital twin model

期刊

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 1319-1332

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2019.1620789

关键词

Maintenance; prestressed concrete bridges; bridge management system; digital twin; 3D; information model; image processing; 3D-scanning; deterioration

资金

  1. Smart Civil Infrastructure Research Program - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) of the Korean government [18SCIP-B128570-02]
  2. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA)
  3. Chung-Ang University Research Scholarship Grants in 2012
  4. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [128566] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preventive maintenance is increasingly becoming an essential strategy in the bridge industry owing to its proactive advantage of maintaining the structural sustainability during its entire service life. Several in-use bridges lack an appropriate regular maintenance solution, leading to extra cost during the operation stage. This paper proposes a new generation of the bridge maintenance system by using a digital twin model concept for more reliable decision-making. A detailed solution is proposed in this work to enhance the bridge maintenance process using a parallel solution: a maintenance information management system based on a 3D information model in conjunction with a digital inspection system using image processing. Three-dimensional digital models are required to utilise information from the entire lifecycle of a project, including design and construction, operation, and maintenance, by continuously exchanging and updating data from each stakeholder. For the maintenance of prestressed concrete bridges, the twin models are defined and their uses are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据