4.5 Article

Comparing antioxidant activities of flavonols from Annona coriacea by four approaches

期刊

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 253-258

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.03.011

关键词

Annonaceae; Antiradical activity; Flavonoids; Oxidative stress; Radicals

资金

  1. CAPES, Brazil [001]
  2. CNPq
  3. FAPESP [2013/07543-0]
  4. CNPq research fellowship
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/07543-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antioxidants protect cells from the injuries caused by oxidative reactive species, especially under biotic and abiotic stressful conditions. Each kind of free radical presents different oxidative sites and, therefore, different assays could be done to better evaluate the antioxidant capacity of a compound. Little is known about secondary metabolites from Annona coriacea Mart. (Annonaceae), especially related to their antioxidant capacity. Eleven flavonols were isolated from leaves: Quercetin-3-O-gentiobioside (1), Quercetin-3-O-robinobioside (2), Rutin (3), Hyperin (4), Isoquercitrin (5), Biorobin (6), Nicotiflorin (7), Keioside (8), Narcissin (9), Cacticin (10) and Isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside (11). The isolated compounds and their commercial aglycones were evaluated in DPPH, ABTS(+center dot) radical scavenging, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and oxygen reduction antioxidant capacity (ORAC). Two patterns of response were observed. In the first, found in DPPH and FRAP assays, quercetin and its derivatives (1-5) showed higher antioxidant activity than kaempferol (6-7) and isorhamnetin derivatives (8-11). On the other hand, in the second pattern, observed in ABTS(+center dot) and ORAC assays, isorhamnetin showed higher or similar activities than quercetin derivatives. These differences were attributed to the B-ring substitution pattern of flavonols and to the distinct mechanisms of antioxidant activity in each assay. Different assays must be performed to determine the mechanisms of antiradicalar action of a compound. (C) 2019 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据