4.7 Article

Rehabilitation of a highly saline-sodic soil using a rubble barrier and organic amendments

期刊

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 176-188

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.01.003

关键词

Construction debris; Pyrochar; Hydrochar; Compost; Plant succession; Gas emissions

资金

  1. PAPIME program (UNAM) [PE 102217]
  2. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of biochar and compost is a promising alternative to recover salt-degraded soils. However, in areas where the main source of salinity comes from the groundwater, it is also necessary to restrict the capillary rise of salts by means of a barrier. In this study, we show results of a field experiment, in which we tested the effect of a rubble barrier and the addition of biochar and compost on the establishment of a salt-tolerant grass (Distichlis spicata) in a highly saline-sodic soil. Our results showed that the capillary barrier: i) diminished the electrical conductivity and the CO2 fluxes by about one third to one half the values without barrier for both variables, ii) decreased the topsoil moisture (without barrier ca. 25-35%; barrier-zone ca. 15-25%), and iii) promoted the plant growth. Organic amendments did not show any effect. However, high-dose treatments had lower moisture content than the unamended ones (ca. 3-6% less water). Arrival of new plant species occurred preferably in the barrier-zone. We conclude that the barrier is an effective tool to decrease the soil salinity, but irrigation is needed to overcome smaller soil moisture during the dry season. Pyrochar was the most re-commendable amendment to be used. However, biochar and compost doses were insufficient for the rehabilitation of this highly saline-sodic soil. The natural emergence of plant species (Suaeda torreyana, Kochia scoparia and Sonchus oleraceus) can improve the rehabilitation activities in an effective and inexpensive way. Urban residues can effectively be used to establish a plant cover in saline-sodic soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据