4.8 Article

General Approach to Produce Nanostructured Binary Transition Metal Selenides as High-Performance Sodium Ion Battery Anodes

期刊

SMALL
卷 15, 期 33, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201901995

关键词

binary metal selenides; Fe2NiSe4; hierarchically porous structures; in situ XRD; sodium-ion batteries; transition metal chalcogenides; universal approach

资金

  1. NSFC [51590882, 51631001, 81421004, 51672010] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0200102] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple transition metals containing chalcogenides have recently drawn boosted attraction as anodes for sodium ion batteries (SIBs). Their greatly enhanced electrochemical performances can be attributed to the superior intrinsic conductivities and richer redox reactions, comparative to mono metal chalcogenides. To employ various binary metals comprising selenides (B-TMSs) for SIBs, discovery of a simplistic, scalable and universal synthesis approach is highly desirable. Herein, a simple, facile, and comprehensive strategy to produce various combinations of nanostructured B-TMSs is presented. As a proof of concept, optimized, high surface area bearing, and hierarchical nanosheets of iron-nickel selenide (FNSe), iron-cobalt selenide, and nickel-cobalt selenide are produced and employed in SIBs. These B-TMSs exhibit adequately high energy capacities, excellent rate capabilities, and an extraordinarily stable life of 2600 cycles. As far as it is known, it is the first work to discuss sodium storage of FNSe, so various in situ and ex situ battery analyses are carried out to probe the sodium storage mechanism. When employed in sodium full batteries, these B-TMSs present reasonably high reversible specific capacities even after 100 cycles. Overall, the presented strategy will pave the way for facile synthesis of numerous binary transition metal chalcogenides that are the potential materials for energy storage and conversion systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据