4.7 Article

Reverse micellar modified mixed anionic and zwitterionic surfactant system for antibiotic extraction

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115816

关键词

Mixed reverse micellar extraction; Antibiotic; Zwitterionic surfactant

资金

  1. University Malaysia Pahang [UMP-PGRS-160361]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A reverse micellar was modified by combining the anionic AOT and zwitterionic lauryl sulfobetaine surfactant for the extraction of erythromycin was proposed for the first time as a new approach for antibiotic extraction. The stability of the mixed reverse micelle was evaluated in terms of the critical micelle concentration (CMC) using the Wilhehny Ring method, as well as the thermodynamic properties prior to extraction. The effect of parameters such as AOT concentration, lauryl sulfobetaine fraction and pH of the aqueous phase was investigated during forward extraction. Isopropanol volume percent (%), NaCl concentration, and pH of aqueous phase were investigated during backward extraction. The thermodynamic analysis confirmed the stability of the mixed AOT/lauryl sulfobetaine reverse micelle with a positive synergistic effect. The surface activity was enhanced, by which the CMC of the mixed reverse micelle was significantly lowered, ranging from 0.7 to 5.7 g/L. The overall thermodynamic data comprising Delta G(m) (between - 15.44 and - 20.24 kJ/mol), Delta G(ads) (between - 27.03 and - 28.97 kJ/mol), and Delta G(ex)(o) (range between - 0.39 and 8.87 kJ/mol) are affirmative that micellization was spontaneous. Erythromycin was also found to be interfacially active at all tested condition. The highest erythromycin solubilisation (94.2%) was achieved, even with low AOT surfactant (60.0 g/L) which reflects the synergy between AOT and lauryl sulfobetaine. In addition, in the absence of isopropanol, erythromycin was found to be successfully recovered during the backward extraction. However, isopropanol is still considered as a recovery booster which enables higher erythromycin recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据