4.7 Article

Development of a sandwich ELIME assay exploiting different antibody combinations as sensing strategy for an early detection of Campylobacter

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 318-325

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.03.140

关键词

C. jejuni; C. coli; ELIME assay; Antibody combinations; Culture medium; Cell treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Campylobacter is an important cause of acute bacterial disease in human worldwide. Within the genus Campylobacter, C. jejuni and C. coli are the two species responsible for over 95% of human infections. The purpose of this work is the development of an Enzyme-Linked-Immuno-Magnetic-Electrochemical (ELIME) assay for a simple and rapid detection of both Campylobacter species. Tosyl-activated magnetic beads (MBs), supporting a sandwich immunological complex, were coupled to a strip of 8-magnetized screen-printed electrodes, as electrochemical transducing element. With the aim to simultaneously detect C. jejuni and C. coli, four anti-campylobacter antibodies were screened in ELISA paying the attention to the selection of both culture medium and cell treatment (whole campylobacter cells inactivated with NaN3 and heat killed cells) for a suitable antigen-antibody interaction. Six combinations of the selected anti-campylobacter antibodies, unconjugated and conjugated with Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) or Alkaline Phosphatase (AP), were exploited as sensing strategy to set-up the ELIME assay. The antibody pair, consisting of a goat polyclonal antibody anti-campylobacter (coated on the surface of MBs) and the same antibody conjugated with AP (to label the captured cells), was selected given the best response for both Campylobacter species and the lowest detection limit (9 x 10(3) CFU/mL for C. jejuni and 2 x 10(4) CFU/mL for C. coli). The selectivity of the ELIME assay was proved by analyzing other C. jejuni strains and non target microorganisms attaining promising results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据