4.7 Article

An innovative immunochromatography assay for highly sensitive detection of 17β-estradiol based on an indirect probe strategy

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 48-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.03.078

关键词

Immunochromatography assay; Indirect probe; Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles; 17 beta-Estradiol

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675127]
  2. Natural Science Foudation of Qinghai Province [2019-ZJ-904]
  3. Development Project of Qinghai Key Laboratory [2017-ZJ-Y10]
  4. Capacity Building Project of Engineering Research Center of Qinghai Province [2017-GX-G03]
  5. Shaanxi Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [2018JC-011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasensitive and fast screening of small molecule contaminants by immunochromatography assay (ICA) is still challenging in field conditions. Here, a novel indirect probe based ICA (ipICA) for highly sensitive detection of 17 beta-estradiol (E2) was introduced. The strategy was achieved using carboxyl modified Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to label goat anti-mouse antibody (GAMA). The free anti-E2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) rather than labeled mAb was adopted to capture E2 molecules. For comparison, MNPs-based traditional and dual-probe ICAs were also prepared. This strip sensor demonstrated higher sensitivity, with a lowest visible detection limit of 0.2 ng mL(-1), which was 5 and 2 times better than that of the MNPs-based traditional strip and dual-probe strip, respectively. The outstanding performance of this novel sensor mainly benefited from the decreased amount of free mAb and the signal amplification of this strategy. Additionally, this method was successfully applied in the detection of E2 in milk, prawn, fish and chicken samples. The proposed sensor exhibited acceptable accuracy for on-site detection of target analyte in food safety monitoring, also has potential applications for the other small molecule contaminants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据