4.7 Article

Label-free electrochemical immunosensor based on AuNPs/Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-800@graphene composites for sensitive detection of monensin in milk

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 288, 期 -, 页码 571-578

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.03.014

关键词

Electrochemical immunosensor; Metal organic frameworks; Graphene; Au nanoparticles; Monensin

资金

  1. National Science & Technology Pillar Program of 12th Five Year Plan [2014BAD13B05]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-35]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile, efficient and sensitive electrochemical immunosensor based on Au nanoparticles/Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-800@graphene composites was developed to detect the monensin in milk. Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-800 with high stability was obtained via pyrolysis of the Zn/Ni-bimetallic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) precursor Zn/Ni-ZIF-8. Benefitting from the synergistic effects including the high porosity of the Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-800 and the excellent electrical conductivity of graphene, the electrochemical signal got greatly enhanced. The AuNPs were electro-deposited on the Zn/Ni-ZIF-8-800@graphene surface for antibody-antigen capture. Then the constructed hybrid materials not only possess high specific surface area, but also exhibit excellent biocompatibility and electron transfer ability. Morphology and elemental analyse of these composites were conducted via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). In addition, the crystal structure was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Afterwards, the preparation process of the biosensor was investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV), and the detection procedure was evaluated by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). Under the optimal conditions, the achieved linear range was 0.25-100 ng mL(-1), and the calculated detection limit was 0.11 ng mL(-1). The as-prepared biosensor in this work offers an effective approach to measure monensin and may be a promising candidate for detecting other veterinary drugs in food products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据