4.7 Article

A recyclable CNC-milled microfluidic platform for colorimetric assays and label-free aged-related macular degeneration detection

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 484-492

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.025

关键词

Microfluidic platform; CNC; Colorimetry; SERS; Human aqueous humors

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2017R1A2B4002765, 2017R1D1A1B03035912, 2018M3A9E8078812]
  2. Korean Health Technology Research & Development Project [HI14C2241]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4002765, 2018M3A9E8078812, 2017R1D1A1B03035912] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the development of a simple, low-cost, and eco-friendly stand-alone 3D microfluidic chemical sensing platform capable of colorimetric and biochemical analyses at the same time. The microfluidic cellulose micro-fiber (mu CM) chip was prototyped by injecting 10% CM mixtures on computer numeric control (CNC)-milled substrates. We show that the mu CM chip has a 3-fold faster flow rate than conventional microfluidic paper-based analytical devices and is a recyclable platform that could perform basic microfluidic experiments. The colorimetric assays of the mu CM chip can successfully detect clinically relevant concentrations of albumin (R-2=0.9994) and glucose (R-2=0.9464). The gold nanoparticle-induced surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) label-free bioassay of mu CM chips can enhance the Raman signal by 5.15x10(8) and a sensitivity of 0.94 (10 pM-1 mM for CV molecules) with an excellent stability of <5%. We can detect the presence of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) from human aqueous humors with > 96% clinical sensitivity and > 78% clinical specificity (87% accuracy) from principal component linear discriminant analysis (PC-LDA) model-based multivariate statistical analysis methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据