4.6 Article

Ensemble Learning with Stochastic Configuration Network for Noisy Optical Fiber Vibration Signal Recognition

期刊

SENSORS
卷 19, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s19153293

关键词

noisy optical fiber vibration signal recognition; optical fiber pre-warning system; stochastic configuration network; bootstrap sampling; AdaBoost

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61571014]
  2. Beijing Nature Science Foundation [4172017]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB1201104]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for Beijing Universities [110052971803/024, 110052971803/085, 110052971921/015]
  5. Youth Key Talents Project of Organizational Department of Beijing Municipal Committee [401053761856]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optical fiber pre-warning systems (OFPS) based on Phi-OTDR are applied to many different scenarios such as oil and gas pipeline protection. The recognition of fiber vibration signals is one of the most important parts of this system. According to the characteristics of small sample set, we choose stochastic configuration network (SCN) for recognition. However, due to the interference of environmental and mechanical noise, the recognition effect of vibration signals will be affected. In order to study the effect of noise on signal recognition performance, we recognize noisy optical fiber vibration signals, which superimposed analog white Gaussian noise, white uniform noise, Rayleigh distributed noise, and exponentially distributed noise. Meanwhile, bootstrap sampling (bagging) and AdaBoost ensemble learning methods are combined with original SCN, and Bootstrap-SCN, AdaBoost-SCN, and AdaBoost-Bootstrap-SCN are proposed and compared for noisy signals recognition. Results show that: (1) the recognition rates of two classifiers combined with AdaBoost are higher than the other two methods over the entire noise range; (2) the recognition for noisy signals of AdaBoost-Bootstrap-SCN is better than other methods in recognition of noisy signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据