4.6 Article

Capacitive Impedance Measurement: Dual-frequency Approach

期刊

SENSORS
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s19112539

关键词

dielectric constant; electrical conductivity; instrumentation; microcontroller; embedded system

资金

  1. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
  2. Instituto Tecnologico Vale (ITV)
  3. Fundacao Gorceix
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  5. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most widely used technique for measuring capacitive impedances (or complex electrical permittivity) is to apply a frequency signal to the sensor and measure the amplitude and phase of the output signal. The technique, although efficient, involves high-speed circuits for phase measurement, especially when the medium under test has high conductivity. This paper presents a sensor to measure complex electrical permittivity based on an alternative approach to amplitude and phase measurement: The application of two distinct frequencies using a current-to-voltage converter circuit based in a transimpedance amplifier, and an 8-bit microcontroller. Since there is no need for phase measurement and the applied frequency is lower compared to the standard method, the circuit presents less complexity and cost than the traditional technique. The main advance presented in this work is the use of mathematical modeling of the frequency response of the circuit to make it possible for measuring the dielectric constant using a lower frequency than the higher cut-off frequency of the system, even when the medium under test has high conductivity (tested up to 1220 S/cm). The proposed system caused a maximum error of 0.6% for the measurement of electrical conductivity and 2% for the relative dielectric constant, considering measurement ranges from 0 to 1220 S/cm and from 1 to 80, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据