4.7 Article

Effect of scrubbing by NaClO backwashing on membrane fouling in anammox MBR

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 670, 期 -, 页码 149-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.170

关键词

Anammox; MBR; Backwash; NaClO; Resistance; Polysaccharide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878662, 51674305]
  2. key project of Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province [2017SK2420]
  3. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2017CX010]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2017zzts599]
  5. 2017 Huxiang Provincial Scholar Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NaClO based chemically enhanced backwash (CEO) is often administered to maintain membrane permeability during the operation of MBR. However, the effect and working mechanism of NaClO concentrations in CEB were rarely investigated. The current investigation examined the changes in membrane resistance, permeate production and membrane morphology with or without CEB in an anammox MBR to reveal the scrubbing effect of different NaClO concentrations (0-596 mg/L). Good cleaning effect indicated by membrane fouling rate of 1.98-2.26 kPa/day and membrane permeate production of 80-88 L. was observed when NaClO concentration of 149-596 mg/L was used. The best cleaning effect was observed when 298 mg/L of NaClO was used. To explore the mechanism of CEB action, backwashing foulants were also analyzed. Insoluble EPS transformed into soluble forms like S-EN or SMP after the sludge was exposed to NaClO. The NaClO based CEB removed 112-675 mg of polysaccharide (PS)/m(2) in foulants at NaClO concentration of 149-596 mg/L, which was significantly higher than the value obtained by pure water (35 mg PS/m(2)). The possible mechanisms behind the detachment of soluble PS seemed as oxidation and sterilization by NaClO. The current investigation provides useful guidelines on NaClO concentrations applied during CEB for anammox MBR. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据