4.7 Article

Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 668, 期 -, 页码 1289-1297

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.067

关键词

Species Sensitivity Distribution; Benthic vs planktonic organisms; Standard chemicals; Lead chloride

资金

  1. CESAM [UID/AMB/50017 - POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007638]
  2. FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC)
  3. FEDER within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020
  4. FEDER through COMPETE2020 -POCI [PTDC/ATP-EAM/0063/2014]
  5. FCT [SFRH/BD/121341/2016, SFRH/BD/129871/2017, SFRH/BD/112210/2015, IF/01198/2014]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/129871/2017, SFRH/BD/121341/2016, SFRH/BD/112210/2015] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Freshwater ecosystems face widespread diffuse and point-source contamination. Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs) have been used as a tool to determine chemical concentration benchmarks that represent protective levels for most species in the environment. Here we used a SSD approach to assess on the adequacy of standard planktonic organisms to reflect the response of benthic communities, critically supporting the structure and function of lotic ecosystems. For the purpose, SSDs reflecting non-lethal responses of standard planktonic and selected benthic organisms were built based on EC50 values (collected in the literature or estimated following testing herein) regarding three model contaminants: potassium dichromate (PD), 3,5-dichlorophenol (DCP) and lead chloride (LC). The derived HC5 estimates were discriminatory between chemicals and the uncertainty associated with the estimate was remarkably low. The HC5 estimates with corresponding uncertainty were generally within the same order of magnitude for the three chemicals tested, with better discrimination between chemicals regarding their hazardous potential being achieved for benthic organisms: DCP was clearly less hazardous than PD, but LC tends to be as hazardous as PD and DCP (assuming the confidence interval ranges). Moreover, benthic communities were more sensitive to both DCP and PD, in this later case the HC5 being lower by more than one order of magnitude than that found for planktonic communities; for LC, confidence intervals overlapped, preventing a feasible assumption regarding differential sensitivity of the compared communities. Microphytobenthos was highlighted as the most sensitive group to the three tested chemicals in SSDs covering the benthic compartment, while SSDs with planktonic organisms did not consistently show trends in sensitivity ordering. Overall, our results suggest that protective benchmarks retrieved from SSDs built with the responses of standard planktonic organisms (which are the most commonly used for regulation purposes) do not adequately protect benthic communities. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据