4.4 Article

Stress precedes negative symptom exacerbations in clinical high risk and early psychosis: A time-lagged experience sampling study

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 52-58

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.06.015

关键词

Experience sampling method; Psychosis; Clinical high risk; Negative symptoms; Stress; Anhedonia

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experience sampling method (ESM) has revealed associations between fluctuations in stress and positive symptoms in psychosis. It is unknown, however, how negative symptoms including anhedonia respond to stress. Stress is divided according to its source: event-related stress stemming from negative events, and activity-related stress stemming from engaging in tasks beyond one's skill or control. Anhedonia is divided into consummatory and anticipatory anhedonia, reflecting a lack of pleasure in current and expected activities. This study uses ESM to determine whether each form of anhedonia increases in response to stress. Antipsychotic-naive individuals with first episode psychosis (n = 39), clinical high-risk states for psychosis (n = 44), and healthy controls (n = 34) responded to daily prompts on a palmtop computer for up to ten days by indicating levels of stress and anhedonia. Time-lagged multilevel modelling was employed to explore increases in anhedonia following increases in stress while controlling for prior levels of anhedonia. Mean levels of anhedonia were also compared across groups. Only activity-related stress produced increases in anhedonia. This effect did not vary between groups. Clinical groups showed greater overall levels of anhedonia than healthy controls, but did not differ from each other. Anhedonia responds only to activity-related stressors, suggesting that this form of stress has a specific causal role in anhedonia. The results also provide further evidence for global increases in anhedonia in antipsychotic-naive psychosis spectrum individuals. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据