4.7 Article

Changes in skin score in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis are associated with changes in global disease severity

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 398-406

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez299

关键词

systemic sclerosis; scleroderma; skin score; disease outcomes

资金

  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine whether skin score changes are associated with changes in overall disease severity, function and quality of life in early dcSSc patients. Methods A total of 154 and 128 dcSSc patients from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group database with 1 and 2 year follow-up and a disease duration 5 years without end-stage organ damage and/or significant comorbidity at the initial visit were included. Skin was assessed using the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and disease severity by the summed Medsger disease severity score (DSS) (without skin domain), physician and patient global assessments, function [HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI)] and quality of life [36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS)]. Analyses were repeated in patients with a disease duration 3 years. Results At 2 years, 64 (50%) patients had improved skin (mRSS decrease of 5 points and/or 25%). Skin improvers had improved summed DSS (P = 0.002); better physician global assessments of disease activity, severity and damage (all P 0.003); better HAQ-DI (P = 0.001) and SF-36 PCS (P = 0.005). Changes in the mRSS were positively correlated with changes in summed DSS (P = 0.006) and other disease outcomes. In the 26 (20.3%) patients with worsened skin (mRSS increase of 5 points and/or 25%), the summed DSS and physician global assessments were worse (P = 0.01 and P 0.009, respectively). In the subgroup with a disease duration 3 years, similar associations were found. Conclusion At 1 and 2 years, overall disease improvement parallels skin improvement in early dcSSc. This is important for prognosis and reflects the value of mRSS as an outcome measure in trials with these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据