4.7 Article

Nitrogen flows in global pork supply chains and potential improvement from feeding swill to pigs

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 168-179

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.032

关键词

Animal production; Nitrogen use efficiency; Livestock; Food wastes; Life cycle

资金

  1. Teagasc Walsh Fellowship Scheme [2012230]
  2. Livestock Environmental Assessment Performance (LEAP) Partnership [GCP/GLO/369/MUL]
  3. Livestock Information, Sector Analysis and Policy Branch (AGAL) of Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global pork sector contributes to food security and supports livelihoods for millions of households but also causes nitrogen (N) pollution. Here we assess N flows, losses, and N use indicators for global pork supply chains, from cradle-to-primary-processing-gate and for three production systems: the backyard, intermediate and industrial systems. Subsequently, we evaluate the effects of feeding swill to industrial pigs on N flows and land use. To produce 3.5 Tg N of pork globally, 14.7 Tg N are lost into the environment, of which 68% is lost to watercourses in the form of nitrates and organic N and the reminder emitted to the atmosphere as N-gas (e.g., NH3, NOx and N2O). We found that the efficiency of N use, hotspot and magnitude of N losses per unit of area depend chiefly on the region (agro-ecological and economic context), origin of feed, and manure management systems. Swill feeding increases N use efficiency and reduces N losses at the feed production stage. It achieves a saving of 31 Mt of soybeans and 20 Mt of grains on dry matter basis, equivalent to 16 M ha of land used. Its adoption would require innovative policies to preserve food safety and public health. Future research may explore the feasibility and requirements to adopt swill feeding at a country level and may investigate potential impacts on other sustainability objectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据