4.6 Article

Quantitative proteomic analysis of sperm in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-019-0496-5

关键词

Recurrent pregnancy loss; iTRAQ; Sperm; Biomakers; Gene functions and pathways

资金

  1. Innovation fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China [81602440]
  2. Weifang Science and Technology Bureau (Weifang Soft Science Research Program) [2017RKX088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundRecurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) refers to two or more spontaneous abortions that occur consecutively with the same spouse. RPL severely affects human reproduction health, and causes extreme physical and mental suffering to patients and their families.MethodsWe used isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ), which was coupled with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) proteomic analysis, in order to identify differentially expressed proteins. Moreover, we used western blot to analyze differentially expressed proteins.ResultsOf the 2350 non-redundant proteins identified, 38 proteins were significantly altered and were identified as potential biomarkers for RPL. The protein-protein interaction network constructed using GeneMANIA revealed that 35.55% displayed similar co-expression, 30.87% were predicted, and 20.95% had physical interaction characteristics. Based on Gene ontology classification and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses, the majority of these differentially expressed proteins were found to be related to biological regulation, metabolic and cellular processes, protein binding and different enzymes activities, as well as disorder of fat and glucose metabolic pathways. It is noteworthy that three metabolism related biomarkers (HK1, ACLY, and FASN) were further confirmed through western blot analysis.ConclusionsThese results suggest that these differentially expressed proteins may be used as biomarkers for RPL, and related signaling pathways may play crucial roles in male induced RPL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据