4.8 Review

A review on catalyst development for dry reforming of methane to syngas: Recent advances

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 175-193

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.054

关键词

Methane reforming; Deactivation; DFT; Active sites; Support; Syngas; Review

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme from Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia [FRGS/1/2017/STG01/UTM/01/1(4F934)]
  2. Research University Grant from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [19H04]
  3. National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS) Assessment Intervention Fund for Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University Bauchi, Nigeria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abrupt and massive deactivation of methane dry reforming catalysts especially Ni-based is still a monumental impediment towards its industrialization and commercialization for production of value-added syngas via Fischer-Tropsch process. The need for further and more critical understanding of inherent and tailored interactions of catalyst components for performance and stability enhancement during reforming reaction cannot be over-emphasized. This review provides a contemporary assessment of progresses recorded on synergistic interplay among catalyst components (active metals, support, promoters and binders) during dry reforming using state-of-the-art experimental and theoretical techniques. Advancements achieved during interplay leading to improvements in properties of existing catalysts and discovery of novel ones were stated and expatiated. Reaction pathways, catalytic activities, selection of appropriate synthesis route and metal/support deactivation via sintering or carbon deposition have over time been successfully studied and explained using information from these crucial component interactions. This perspective describes the roles of these interactions and their applications towards development of robust catalysts configurations for successful industrial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据