4.8 Article

Sustainable production of bioenergy from novel non-edible seed oil (Prunus cerasoides) using bimetallic impregnated montmorillonite clay catalyst

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 321-332

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.029

关键词

Biodiesel; Clay; Cleaner production; Catalyst; Non-edible seed oil; Prunus cerasoides

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission [6172/Federal/NRPU/RD/HEC/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study examines the efficiency of double metals (Cd and Mn) impregnated montmorillonite clay (Cd-Mn-Mmt) catalyst for the cleaner synthesis of biodiesel from novel non-edible seed oil of Prunus Cerasoides D. Don. (seed oil content 54.5%, and FFA content 0.45 mg KOH/g). X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) and Fourier Transform Infrared Radiation Spectroscopy (FTIR) were used for characterizing the newly synthesized catalyst. The highest (85%) fatty acid methyl ester yield (FAME) of Prunus Cerasoides D. Don. biodiesel was obtained at optimized transesterification reaction conditions; 5 h of reaction time at 120 degrees C, 12:1 M ratio of methanol to oil and 4% catalyst loading. Synthesized biodiesel was further characterized via FTIR, Gas Chromatography/Mass spectroscopy (GC/MS), and Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR (H-1, C-13)). Additionally, the determined fuel properties, such as density (0.8612 kg/ L), kinematic viscosity (4.11 mm(2)/s), flash point (73 degrees C), cloud point (-9 degrees C) and pour point (-10 degrees C), of synthesized biodiesel, agreed with International Standards of China GB/T 20828 (2007), American (ASTM-951, 6751) and European Union (EU-14214). Pseudo-first-order kinetics fitted well with the experimental data (R-2 = 0.9172). The study findings recommended that the modified montmorillonite clay catalyst is a cleaner, cheaper, and easy to use along with high stability and catalytic performance in the transesterification process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据