4.7 Article

On the intrinsic shape of oceanic eddies derived from satellite altimetry

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 75-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.011

关键词

Mesoscale eddies; Eddy shape; Eddy orientation; Satellite altimetry

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Peoples Republic of China [2016YFC1401008]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41527901, U1606405, 41331172]
  3. Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology of China [2018SDKJ102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fundamental issue of mean eddy shape at the sea surface has been simplified as axially symmetric for a long time. This assumption is worth of a reexamination following significant advances in precise tracking of individual eddies, thanks to the recent availability of merged altimeter data with a grid resolution of 1/4 degrees x 1/4 degrees and a time interval of one day. Based on an orientationally aligned average of the effective boundaries of nearly 2.6 million individual eddies available to date, a characteristic shape of a standard eddy has been derived, which is found to be a very good approximation to a mathematical ellipsoid with a semimajor axis of a = 87.0 km, and a semiminor axis of b = 54.0 km. The oval nature of oceanic eddies appears to be universal in a climatological sense, but the best-fit ellipse varies with space and time. Statistically, the eddy ellipse has two preferred angles for its major axis: a primary angle of 104 degrees/284 degrees (nearly north-south) and a secondary angle of 1717351 (nearly east-west). The intrinsic geometric asymmetry in eddy shape and orientation is believed to be one of the fundamental reasons behind the previously observed geophysical anisotropy in eddy properties. Future integrated analysis in an eddy-centric coordinate system with an ellipse geometry may open a new window into nonlinear mesoscale oceanography in terms of eddy kinetics and eddy dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据