4.7 Article

Remaining useful life prediction of machinery under time-varying operating conditions based on a two-factor state-space model

期刊

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 88-100

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.017

关键词

Prognostic degradation modeling; Remaining useful life prediction; Time-varying operating conditions; State-space model

资金

  1. NSFC-Zhejiang Joint Fund for the Integration of Industrialization and Informatization [U1709208]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673311]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growth of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has generated a renewed emphasis on research of prognostic degradation modeling whereby degradation signals, such as vibration signals, temperature and acoustic emissions, are used to estimate the state-of-health and predict the remaining useful life (RUL). Besides the inherent system state, external operating conditions, such as the rotational speed and load also play a significant role in the behavior of degradation signals. Time-varying operating conditions often cause two major effects on the degradation signals. First, they change the degradation rate of systems. Second, they cause signal jumps at condition change-points. These two factors make RUL prediction more difficult under time-varying operating conditions. This paper proposes a RUL prediction method by introducing these two factors into a state-space model. Changes in the degradation rate are introduced into a state transition function, and jumps in the degradation signals are introduced into a measurement function. The separate analysis of these two factors makes it possible to distinguish their own contributions to RUL prediction, thus avoiding false alarms and improving the prediction accuracy. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated using both a simulation study and an accelerated degradation test of rolling element bearings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据