4.2 Article

Effects of model parameters, topography, and scale on the mass movement processes of debris avalanches using the discrete element method

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-016-2441-7

关键词

Debris avalanche; Numerical simulation; Discrete element method; Mass movement; Supplying process; Impact factors

资金

  1. Key Deployment Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-05-01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41472272, 41102194]
  3. Science Foundation for Excellent Youth Scholars of Sichuan University [2013SCU04A07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mass movement process of a debris avalanche is a complex dynamic system and is influenced by topographic conditions, material composition, sliding-bed surface conditions and other factors. A discrete element method is used to simulate the mass movement process of debris avalanches and is validated by laboratory flume tests. Sensitivity analyses for the model parameters show that a low bond strength indicates that a small impact force can lead to slope failure. The friction coefficient has a little effect on the mass movement process. However, high particle stiffness and bond strength causes the sliding material to behave like a rigid block of rock; therefore low bond strength and particle stiffness are selected to simulate the laboratory flume tests. The velocity of the sliding material increases with the increasing slope of the flume. If the sliding material hits a barrier, the travel direction will change and energy dissipation will occur, resulting in the sudden decrease in velocity. With an increase in landslide volume, the model parameters particle stiffness and parallel bond strength should be increased to ensure the reasonableness of the simulated results. When the landslide volume is not large enough, the selection of those model parameters has no significant effect on the movement process. The proper selection of model parameters is very important for the reasonableness of the simulated results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据