4.2 Article

Insulation effects of Icelandic dust and volcanic ash on snow and ice

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-015-2224-6

关键词

Iceland; Insulation; Ash; Dust; Snow; Albedo

资金

  1. NordForsk as part of the Nordic Centre of Excellence within the framework of Cryosphere-atmosphere interactions in a changing Arctic climate (CRAICC), which is a part of the Top-level Research Initiative (TRI)
  2. Centre of Excellence in Atmospheric Science - Finnish Academy of Sciences Excellence [272041]
  3. Finnish Academy of Sciences [254195]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [254195, 254195] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Arctic region, Iceland is an important source of dust due to ash production from volcanic eruptions. In addition, dust is resuspended from the surface into the atmosphere as several dust storms occur each year. During volcanic eruptions and dust storms, material is deposited on the glaciers where it influences their energy balance. The effects of deposited volcanic ash on ice and snow melt were examined using laboratory and outdoor experiments. These experiments were made during the snow melt period using two different ash grain sizes (1 phi and 3.5 phi) from the Eyjafjallajokull 2010 eruption, collected on the glacier. Different amounts of ash were deposited on snow or ice, after which the snow properties and melt were measured. The results show that a thin ash layer increases the snow and ice melt but an ash layer exceeding a certain critical thickness caused insulation. Ash with 1 phi in grain size insulated the ice below at a thickness of 9-15 mm. For the 3.5 phi grain size, the insulation thickness is 13 mm. The maximum melt occurred at a thickness of 1 mm for the 1 phi and only 1-2 mm for 3.5 phi ash. A map of dust concentrations on Vatnajokull that represents the dust deposition during the summer of 2013 is presented with concentrations ranging from 0.2 up to 16.6 g m(-2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据