4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Why chronic cough in children is different

期刊

PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 51-55

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2019.03.001

关键词

Chronic cough; Children; Cough reflex; Neuroimmune

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, there have been robust changes in our knowledge of the neurophysiology of cough and novel clinical etiologies. Specifically, cough hypersensitivity in adults and protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) in children have been increasingly investigated, and differences between chronic cough in children and adults have been widely reported. In young children, postinfectious cough, bronchiectasis, airway malacia, PBB, and asthma appear to be the main causes of cough; however, by adolescence, the causes of cough are more likely to become those common in adults, namely, gastroesophageal reflux, asthma, and upper airway syndrome. These differences are attributed to changes in various characteristics of the respiratory tract, immune system, and nervous system between children and adults. New knowledge about the neural aspects of cough has revealed a complex network of pathways that initiate cough. The effect of inflammation on cough neural processing occurs at multiple peripheral and central sites within the nervous system. Evidence exists that direct or indirect neuroimmune interaction induces a complex response, which can be altered by mediators released by the sensory or parasympathetic neurons and vice versa. During childhood, the respiratory tract and the nervous system undergo a series of anatomical and physiological maturation processes that produce the cough neural circuits. Alterations provoked by various pathological processes, noxious agents, infection, and inflammation during the developmental period can lead to persistent or irreversible modifications, which may explain why many adult patients, in addition to expressing high cough sensitivity, remain refractive to disease-specific therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据